Blog Articles

Every AI speech translation session carries a conversation that someone considered worth having in real time, whether it's a board discussion, a diplomatic briefing, or a clinical consultation. That conversation gets captured as audio, processed by machine translation models, and often stored or logged somewhere along the way. If the underlying infrastructure isn't secured properly, the convenience of instant multilingual communication comes with a data protection risk that's easy to overlook until it's tested.

Employees now trust their employer more than any other institution in their lives. According to the 2026 Edelman Trust Barometer, 78% of people trust their employer, ahead of business in general (64%) and government (53%). That figure looks like good news for leadership teams. It is also a warning.

A quarterly earnings call gets moved up by two days. A crisis communications briefing needs to go out to five markets within the hour. A regional sales kickoff, planned months in advance, needs interpreters booked, briefed and ready before the first slide goes up. These are all multilingual events, but they call for different approaches to interpretation, and choosing the wrong one costs time, money or both.

Most conversations about AI language performance still centre on English. A model scores well on a standard benchmark, gets praised as state-of-the-art, and is rolled out for global use. But a growing body of evidence, most recently the European Commission's new EU MMLU dataset, shows that strong English performance says very little about how a model handles French, Hungarian or Maltese. For anyone relying on AI live translation at international events, that gap is not an academic footnote. It is the difference between a delegate understanding a keynote and missing it entirely. 

Picture a training video recorded once in English that a global workforce needs in ten languages by Friday. A decade ago, that request meant hiring voice actors, booking studio time, and waiting weeks for each language. Today, it can mean uploading a file and downloading a dubbed version in hours. This shift is powered by AI dubbing.

Every word matters in football. A manager’s explanation after a defeat, a captain’s message before a final, or a new signing’s first words to the press — these moments are broadcast across the globe, shaping headlines and club reputations.

But football isn’t spoken in just one language. From La Liga to the Premier League, from Serie A to the Champions League, clubs welcome players, journalists and broadcasters from every corner of the world. And UEFA’s regulations make sure those voices are included: press conferences must be accessible through simultaneous interpretation.

The U.S. Department of Justice has extended the compliance dates for its ADA Title II digital accessibility rule, giving state and local public entities more time to meet web and mobile accessibility requirements. According to the interim final rule published on 20 April 2026, organisations serving populations of 50,000 or more now have until 26 April 2027, while smaller public entities and special districts have until 26 April 2028. 

If accessibility compliance is still sitting on next year’s agenda, it’s time to move it forward.

The ADA Title II deadline is April 2026. In California, SB 707 has tightened expectations around public meetings. In the EU, the European Accessibility Act came into force in 2025. In Quebec, Bill 96 reinforces French language requirements across communications. Add to that the Accessible Canada Act, the Equality Act in the UK, and increasing digital accessibility enforcement across Europe, and one thing is clear.

On 3rd October 2025, California Governor Gavin Newsom signed Senate Bill 707 into law. It quietly amended several sections of the Government Code. No fanfare. No viral headlines. But for any organisation involved in delivering, advising on, or participating in California's public meetings, this legislation matters more than most people currently realise.